# Module Architecture This project uses standalone Composer packages for shared functionality, pulled into each e-shop app as regular dependencies. `boboko/core` (this repo) is the foundational module — every e-shop requires it. Other modules (e.g. `boboko/appointments`) require `boboko/core` in turn and layer additional, optional functionality on top. Unlike an in-repo `modules/` directory, each module here lives in **its own repository** from day one. An app pulls it in via Composer, either from a `path` repository (local development, symlinked) or a `vcs`/Packagist reference (plain dev and production). --- ## Directory Structure A module repository (e.g. `boboko-core`) is a self-contained Composer package: ``` boboko-core/ (this repo) composer.json config/ core.php database/migrations/ resources/ views/ logos/ js/ docs/ src/ Auth/ Events/ Extensions/ Filament/Pages/ Mail/ Models/ Services/ Customer/ Extensions/ Listeners/ Models/ RelationManagers/ Command/ Providers/ CoreServiceProvider.php ← entry point, registers itself + config/migrations/assets AuthServiceProvider.php ← staff/admin auth wiring not covered elsewhere CustomerServiceProvider.php ← ModelManifest + Customer↔User event wiring Stoic/ ``` The e-shop app (`boboko-test`) consumes it as `vendor/boboko/core`: ``` boboko-test/ app/ Models/ Customer.php ← app-level model, extends Modules\Core\Customer\Models\Customer User.php ← app-level model, dispatches Modules\Core\Auth\Events\UserCreated Staff.php ← app-level model, extends Modules\Core\Auth\Models\Staff Lunar/ Extensions/ ← app's own Filament resource extensions (source of truth, wired in PanelServiceProvider) Pages/ ← app's own Create/Edit page overrides (event dispatch timing, prefill, etc.) Providers/ AppServiceProvider.php PanelServiceProvider.php ← all LunarPanel wiring for this app EventServiceProvider.php ← all Event::listen registrations for this app config/ core.php ← published from boboko-core, per-app overrides (e.g. auto_create_customer_for_user) modules/ Appointments/ ← a second module, symlinked/required the same way as core ``` Within a module, organise by concern rather than by type (`Auth/`, `Customer/`, not `Models/`, `Services/` at the top level). --- ## Pulling In a Module **In the app's root `composer.json`:** ```json "require": { "boboko/core": "^1.0" }, "repositories": [ { "type": "vcs", "url": "https://code.radical-elements.com/boboko/core.git" } ] ``` This is the **default** — a fresh `composer install` never depends on a local checkout existing. **When developing the module itself alongside the app**, swap the `repositories` entry for a `path` repo pointing at a sibling checkout: ```json "repositories": [ { "type": "path", "url": "../boboko-core", "options": { "symlink": true } } ] ``` This is a **manual, deliberate swap** of `composer.json` — not automated, since Composer has no clean built-in mechanism to merge an additional repository on top of the main list per-environment (`composer.local.json` is not auto-merged in Composer 2.x; `COMPOSER_REPOSITORIES` does not merge either — both were tested and ruled out). Swap it back to `vcs` before committing, so CI/prod builds never require `../boboko-core` to exist. ### Docker Compose: the local-core mount `docker-compose.dev.yml` does **not** mount `../boboko-core` by default — normal app development never needs the sibling checkout present. A separate override file adds just that mount: ``` docker-compose.core-dev.yml ← adds ../boboko-core:/var/www/boboko-core to app/queue/scheduler ``` ```bash # normal app dev docker compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.dev.yml up # developing core locally (also requires the composer.json path-repo swap above) docker compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.dev.yml -f docker-compose.core-dev.yml up # or: bin/dc-core.sh up ``` Docker Compose merges `volumes:` lists additively across `-f` files, so the override only needs to declare the one extra mount per service. --- ## Creating a New Module **1. Create the repository and `composer.json`:** ```json { "name": "boboko/your-module", "description": "What it does", "type": "library", "version": "1.0.0", "require": { "boboko/core": "^1.0" }, "autoload": { "psr-4": { "Modules\\YourModule\\": "src/" } }, "extra": { "laravel": { "providers": [ "Modules\\YourModule\\Providers\\YourModuleServiceProvider" ] } } } ``` **2. Create the service provider:** ```php namespace Modules\YourModule\Providers; use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider; class YourModuleServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider { public function register(): void {} public function boot(): void { $this->loadViewsFrom(__DIR__ . '/../../resources/views', 'your-module'); $this->loadMigrationsFrom(__DIR__ . '/../../database/migrations'); } } ``` **Register every provider the module needs in `extra.laravel.providers`.** A module can define more than one provider (e.g. `CoreServiceProvider`, `AuthServiceProvider`, `CustomerServiceProvider`) — Composer's package auto-discovery only boots providers actually listed here. A provider class that exists but isn't listed silently never runs; this has bitten this project before (see "Provider Registration Pitfalls" below). **3. Require it in the app's `composer.json`**, same as any other module (see "Pulling In a Module" above). Then run `composer update boboko/your-module`. --- ## Provider Registration Pitfalls Composer's Laravel package auto-discovery only boots providers explicitly listed in `extra.laravel.providers`. It is easy to write a second/third provider in a module (e.g. splitting concerns into `AuthServiceProvider`, `CustomerServiceProvider`) and forget to add it to that list — the class compiles fine, autoloads fine, and simply never boots. Symptoms are subtle: `ModelManifest::replace()` never runs, event listeners never attach, and nothing errors — code just silently does nothing. **Before assuming a provider's `boot()` logic is live, check `vendor/composer/installed.json`'s `extra.laravel.providers` for the package**, not just `composer.json` (a local `path`-repo package's cached `extra` metadata does not refresh on file edits alone — `composer dump-autoload` is not enough; a full `composer update ` is required to re-read a changed `composer.json`, and lock-file version conflicts can block that update). ### Duplicate registration between module and app When a module ships a provider that overlaps with app-level Filament wiring (e.g. both independently call `LunarPanel::extensions([...])` for the same resource, or both register the same model-created listener), only one should survive. Prefer whichever is **proven to run** in production (usually the app-level `PanelServiceProvider`/`CorePlugin` wiring, since that's what's actually referenced from the panel registration) and strip the duplicate from the module provider — don't leave both, since duplicate `created`/`updated` listeners fire twice (e.g. sending two invite emails). --- ## Extending the Staff Model via Traits Modules never define their own `Staff` model. Instead, each module ships a trait with its behaviour, and `app/Models/Staff.php` opts in to whatever the app needs. **1. Define a trait in your module:** ```php namespace Modules\YourModule\Concerns; trait HasYourFeature { public function yourRelationship(): HasMany { return $this->hasMany(YourModel::class); } } ``` **2. Use it in `app/Models/Staff.php`:** ```php namespace App\Models; use Modules\Core\Auth\Models\Staff as CoreStaff; use Zap\Models\Concerns\HasSchedules; use Modules\YourModule\Concerns\HasYourFeature; class Staff extends CoreStaff { use HasSchedules; use HasYourFeature; } ``` The app decides which traits to compose — modules have no knowledge of each other. --- ## Model Inheritance Chain ``` Lunar\Admin\Models\Staff ← Lunar base (auth, roles, Filament) └── Modules\Core\Auth\Models\Staff ← OTP fields └── App\Models\Staff ← app model, composes all traits Lunar\Models\Customer ← Lunar base (buyer, addresses, orders) └── Modules\Core\Customer\Models\Customer ← full_name accessor, title suppressed └── App\Models\Customer ← app model, emails()/phones(), Elorus fields ``` Modules never extend each other's `Staff`/`Customer`. If a module needs staff or customer behaviour, it ships a trait, or (for core-generic behaviour) it lives directly in the module's own model, which the app then extends. **`Customer` is not Authenticatable.** Auth is handled entirely by `App\Models\User` (see "Customer/User Pairing" below) — this changed during this project; earlier revisions made `Customer` implement `Authenticatable` directly, which has since been reverted. --- ## Customer/User Pairing Two independent Laravel models exist per person: `App\Models\User` (the only `Authenticatable` entity, `web` guard) and `App\Models\Customer` (Lunar's buyer record — addresses, orders, no login). They are linked via Lunar's own `customer_user` pivot table (`$customer->users()` / `$user->customers()` / `$user->latestCustomer()`), not a direct foreign key — this is Lunar's native relationship shape, not something this project invented. **Which direction creates which depends on the app:** - **Generic e-shop flow (core's default, `config('core.auto_create_customer_for_user')`, default `true`):** a storefront visitor supplies only an email (Shopify-style passwordless). `Modules\Core\Auth\Services\UserOtpService::generateAndSend()` finds-or-creates the `User`. A genuinely new `User` fires `Modules\Core\Auth\Events\UserCreated`, handled by `Modules\Core\Customer\Listeners\CreateCustomerForUser`, which creates a bare `Customer` (no name yet — nothing was collected at signup) and attaches it via the pivot. - **This app's flow (`boboko-test`, flag set to `false` in its published `config/core.php`):** staff create a `Customer` directly (often pre-filled from an appointment booking) with real business data (name, email, VAT, etc.). `App\Events\CustomerCreated` (dispatched manually — see "Event Timing" below) is handled by `App\Listeners\CreateUserForCustomerListener`, which finds-or-creates the paired `User` by the customer's primary email. **A shop opts out of core's default cascade by publishing and editing `config/core.php`:** ```bash php artisan vendor:publish --tag=core-config ``` ```php // config/core.php 'auto_create_customer_for_user' => false, ``` Both listeners guard against the other direction re-triggering: they call `User::withoutEvents(...)` around `firstOrCreate`/save, so pairing a `Customer` never spuriously fires `UserCreated` (and vice versa) even if both directions are somehow active at once. --- ## Event Timing: Filament Repeaters and Model Events **Do not dispatch domain events from a model's `$dispatchesEvents` (`created`/`updated`) when the event's listeners depend on related data saved via a Filament relationship `Repeater`** (e.g. `Repeater::make('emails')->relationship('emails')`). Filament's `CreateRecord`/`EditRecord` pages save the base record first (firing Eloquent's `created`/`updated` immediately), then save repeater-managed relations in a separate step afterward. A listener that reads `$customer->primaryEmail()` inside a `CustomerCreated`/`CustomerUpdated` handler triggered this way will silently see no email — no error, just a no-op. **Fix:** dispatch the event manually from the Filament page's `afterCreate()`/`afterSave()` hook instead, once relations are guaranteed persisted: ```php // app/Lunar/Pages/CreateCustomer.php class CreateCustomer extends BaseCreateRecord { protected function afterCreate(): void { /** @var \App\Models\Customer $customer */ $customer = $this->record; event(new CustomerCreated($customer)); } } ``` ```php // app/Lunar/Pages/EditCustomer.php class EditCustomer extends BaseEditCustomer // extends Lunar's own EditCustomer, not BaseEditRecord directly { public function afterSave(): void { parent::afterSave(); // preserves Lunar's own afterSave() behaviour (e.g. sync_with_search) event(new CustomerUpdated($this->record)); } } ``` Remove the corresponding entry from the model's `$dispatchesEvents` array so the event only fires once, from the page. Both pages must be wired into the resource's `extendPages()`: ```php public function extendPages(array $pages): array { $pages['create'] = CreateCustomer::route('/create'); $pages['edit'] = EditCustomer::route('/{record}/edit'); return $pages; } ``` --- ## Splitting Service Providers When a service provider grows beyond a handful of responsibilities, split it into focused sub-providers and register **each one individually** in `extra.laravel.providers` (see "Provider Registration Pitfalls" above — registering only the entry-point provider silently drops the others). **Each sub-provider owns one concern:** ```php // AuthServiceProvider — staff auth wiring not already covered by the app's own CorePlugin/PanelServiceProvider class AuthServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider { public function boot(): void { if ($this->app->runningInConsole()) { $this->app->booted(fn () => $this->commands([CreateAdminCommand::class])); } } } // CustomerServiceProvider — customer model replacement + Customer/User event wiring class CustomerServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider { public function boot(): void { ModelManifest::replace(LunarCustomer::class, Customer::class); Event::listen(UserCreated::class, CreateCustomerForUser::class); } } ``` **Rule of thumb:** if a provider has more than one `use` group (e.g. Lunar imports alongside mail imports alongside event imports), it is doing too much. If two providers (module and app) would both register the same `LunarPanel::extensions()` call or the same model-event listener, one of them is redundant — see "Provider Registration Pitfalls." --- ## Filament Panel Integration All `LunarPanel::*` calls that must run before `LunarPanel::register()` (which snapshots `getRelations()` and locks in Livewire component registrations) live in the app's `PanelServiceProvider::register()`: ```php // PanelServiceProvider::register() LunarPanel::extensions([...]); // must come before register() LunarPanel::panel(fn ($panel) => ...); LunarPanel::disableTwoFactorAuth(); LunarPanel::register(); // snapshots everything above ``` Module-level extensions belong in the module's own sub-provider **only if the app isn't already the one wiring that resource's extension** — check `PanelServiceProvider` first. The rule: if removing the module would break the configuration, it belongs in the module; if the app already owns that wiring (common for `CustomerResource`/`StaffResource` in this project), the module's own attempt to also wire it is dead weight or a duplicate-registration bug. --- ## Overriding Lunar Relation Managers Lunar resources ship with their own relation managers (e.g. `CustomerResource` has `AddressRelationManager`, `UserRelationManager`). To replace or remove one: **1. Create your relation manager extending the one you want to replace** (only if you need to keep it, with changes): ```php // app/Lunar/RelationManagers/AddressRelationManager.php class AddressRelationManager extends BaseAddressRelationManager { public function getDefaultTable(Table $table): Table { ... } } ``` **2. In the resource extension's `getRelations()`, swap or filter it out:** ```php class CustomerResourceExtension extends BaseExtension { public function getRelations(array $relations): array { $relations = array_map( fn ($relation) => $relation == BaseAddressRelationManager::class ? AddressRelationManager::class : $relation, array_filter( $relations, fn ($relation) => $relation != BaseUserRelationManager::class, // drop entirely ) ); return $relations; } } ``` **Always compare against the Lunar base class** (`Lunar\Admin\...\AddressRelationManager`), not an intermediate class from a module. If a module has already swapped it and your extension compares against the module's class, the swap silently fails when boot order changes. **3. Register the extension in `PanelServiceProvider::register()` before `LunarPanel::register()`** — extensions registered later (e.g. in `boot()`) are too late; Livewire component names are already locked in. --- ## Layering Module and App Configuration `LunarPanel::extensions()` **merges** — calling it twice for the same resource registers both extensions. They run in registration order, each receiving the result of the previous one. **Only do this deliberately** — if both a module's provider and the app's `PanelServiceProvider` register an extension for the same resource without intending to layer, you get duplicate behaviour (see "Provider Registration Pitfalls"). ```php // CustomerServiceProvider::boot() — Core's fields LunarPanel::extensions([CustomerResource::class => CoreCustomerResourceExtension::class]); // PanelServiceProvider::register() — App's fields, applied on top LunarPanel::extensions([CustomerResource::class => AppCustomerResourceExtension::class]); ``` Both `extendForm()` methods run: Core's first, App's second.